Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuananzhi X99-F8  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 00:00
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 746
67% 563 Pts
64-Core 1,710
106% 1,710 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1584) 3GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 30.7
21% 34.3 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29.5
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501/128GB 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 187 282 118 149 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 38.3
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 170
86% 405 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 22.4
94% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 336
295% 437 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 175%
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
194GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 100 101 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 102
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback