Lenovo ThinkServer TS440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo ThinkServer TS440  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO ThinkServer TS440
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateNov 15 '15 at 19:40
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
68% 150 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 391
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 57% Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3649) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5887
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 19
Parallax 21.5
21% 22 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 18.7
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9240-8i 127GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
Read 134
Write 45.3
Mixed 68.3
18% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.15
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 5.41
39% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 6.75
DQ Write 66.7
DQ Mixed 24.7
23% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
447GB free
Firmware: 1H17
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 112
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.33
88% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
418GB free
Firmware: 1H17
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 115
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: 1H18
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 123
Write 126
Mixed 121
93% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.49
116% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 70%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
150GB free
Firmware: 0A82
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 77.8
Mixed 74.7
63% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.17
85% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 88%
Typical ThinkServer TS440 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo ThinkServer TS440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback