Lenovo 7052C2U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 7052C2U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory7.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 20:12
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 330
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 852E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 67
Parallax 60.1
47% 61.5 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 52.8
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 129 131 176 165 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 468
Write 155
Mixed 168
SusWrite 161
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 18.6
74% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 53.7
DQ Mixed 78.5
70% 111 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
173GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 60 83 104 105 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 88.5
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052C2U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052C2U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback