Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 21:03
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 67.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,000
95% 785 Pts
64-Core 1,525
94% 1,525 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 119
Parallax 136
111% 130 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 177 161 64 172 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 503
Write 451
Mixed 381
SusWrite 171
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 38.8
138% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 152
128% 185 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 97%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
109GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,538
Write 2366
Mixed 1,666
487% 2,190 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 87.8
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 921
699% 946 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.9% Very poor
Read 42.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 38.8
9% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 12.9
44% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.1
DQ Write 21.6
DQ Mixed 16.5
16% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 75%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WRSN 500GB
457GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 335 312 302 300 302 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 446
Mixed 355
SusWrite 311
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 45.6
157% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 194
149% 202 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 106%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WRSN 500GB
261GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 320 309 299 300 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 444
Mixed 340
SusWrite 307
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 45.5
157% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 194
149% 202 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 106%
Synology iSCSI Storage 913GB
585GB free
Firmware: 3.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 26 29 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 36.4
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 26.7
29% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 7.5
1,272% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback