Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 263
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 860
82% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,307
81% 1,307 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 103
Parallax 105
86% 105 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 82.7
79% 99.2 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 354 363 377 373 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 420
Write 368
Mixed 297
SusWrite 352
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 29.7
114% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 195
142% 185 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 24.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 22
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $882
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback