Dell Precision T5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T5600
MotherboardDell Precision T5600  (all builds)
Memory104.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 01 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 161
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 624
57% 476 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.6% Good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 87.7
Parallax 78.4
76% 86.3 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 70.5
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 215 226 214 218 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 244
Write 224
Mixed 202
SusWrite 218
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 27
94% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 149
114% 156 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 137%
VK0480GDPVT 480GB
443GB free
Firmware: HPS5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 212 219 219 214 223 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 231
Write 219
Mixed 208
SusWrite 217
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 17.5
65% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 148
111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 49%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: 3BKH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 78 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 74.8
Write 79.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 76.1
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
Synology iSCSI Storage 913GB
841GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 79 78 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
Read 63.2
Write 78.2
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 78
54% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 6.4
1,151% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron-002C 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 Samsung-00CE M393B2G70EB0-YK0 Samsung-00CE M393B2G70EB0-YK0 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.8% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 33.3
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5600 Builds (Compare 896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback