Asus H97-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140522
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '21 at 18:52
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 126 52% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 402 53% 400 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 7.7 Parallax 5.2 5% 6.27 fps	MRender 7.2 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 6.4 5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 162 Write 50.3 Mixed 69.7 20% 94 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 8.9 37% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 39.5 DQ Mixed 45.6 59% 113 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 224GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 68 67 66 65 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 99.1 Write 100 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 67.1 60% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 65%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46 4,063 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 47GB free Firmware: VM100-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 48 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 45.1 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 47.5 30% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 32%
Samsung HD155UI 1.5TB 1,454 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 190GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 54 54 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 70.6 Write 22.6 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 53.9 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 344GB free Firmware: 8101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 54 56 56 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 68.6 Write 41.5 Mixed 47.9 SusWrite 56.5 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 72%
Asmt USB 3.1 Storage 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 661GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 33 33 32 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 35.1 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 32.6 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 76%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2.5TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 66GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 37 37 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 96.4 Write 113 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 37.1 94% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 49%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 48 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 98.7 Write 99.4 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 48.1 98% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.6 196% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 64%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB 3,080 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 328GB free, PID 25fe Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 53 53 54 54 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 117 Write 98.5 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 54.6 106% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.5 164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-171.A00LF 9905403-182.A01LF 9905403-171.A00LF 9905403-182.A01LF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 2133, 1600, 2133 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PRO Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	170x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	103x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	65x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	44x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16