Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 08:27
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$215
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 199
2-Core 395
116% 224 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,501
134% 1,131 Pts
64-Core 2,343
145% 2,343 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1929 1879 1888 1895 1888 1913 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 1,925
Mixed 1208
SusWrite 1,899
404% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 72.1
278% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,644
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,204
978% 1,392 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 353%
Great: 508%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$235
147GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 4.5 0.5 3.3 13 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 304
Write 13.7
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 9.1
18% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 26.9
92% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 0.6
DQ Mixed 30.6
19% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 122%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
31GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 208 84 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 447
Write 432
Mixed 404
SusWrite 167
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 42.5
137% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 337
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
60GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 264 163 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 444
Mixed 403
SusWrite 229
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 47.3
155% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 335
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
48GB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 0.6 8.5 40 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 319
Write 351
Mixed 304
SusWrite 23.6
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 227
160% 205 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
13GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 478
Mixed 432
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 46.9
155% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 335
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
62GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 63 61 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 84.9
Write 88
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 61.8
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29
32GB free
Firmware: ST6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.6 0.1 1.4 14 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 85.9
Write 88.1
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 10.5
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MQ03ABB200 2TB
30GB free
Firmware: JP05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 78 83 86 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 80
Write 81.9
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 80.7
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 70%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
37GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 90.6
Write 87.9
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 72.2
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 81%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
25GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 101 103 100 101 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 110
Write 99.4
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 102
127% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.5
307% 3.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 0.3
266% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
69GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 43 39 38 36 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 93.2
Write 77.8
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 42.9
74% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
32GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 90 90 91 91 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 112
Write 105
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 88
124% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 64%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
14GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 83.7
Write 89.9
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 68.5
93% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-B 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
154% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 61.5
MC Mixed 56.7
172% 60.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 27.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 3,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $1,121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback