Asus H97-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97-PRO  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 193
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 407
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 5.2
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.4
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 29 27 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50% Average
Read 380
Write 52.2
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 29.1
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 17.3
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 48.3
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 73%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
216GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 77 79 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 92.9
Write 85.9
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 78.7
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 65%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
47GB free
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 40.1
Write 46.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 47.4
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-171.A00LF 9905403-182.A01LF 9905403-171.A00LF 9905403-182.A01LF 8GB
1600, 2133, 1600, 2133 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PRO Builds (Compare 680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback