Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 19:57
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 257
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 719
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 65.6
52% 67.8 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 57.7
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 774 425 347 355 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,110
Write 1,658
Mixed 1,338
SusWrite 640
268% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 51.8
178% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 566
430% 573 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 164%
Great: 295%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
223GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 27 30 32 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Crucial_FCCT256MX100SSD1 256GB
113GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 231 182 168 164 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 328
Write 326
Mixed 256
SusWrite 200
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 36.7
128% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 165
134% 188 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 98%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.7 2.5 2.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,949
Write 3.2
SusWrite 0.9
465% 651 MB/s
4K Read 353
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
14,793% 118 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 159%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
137GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 12 14 15 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
982GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 40 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 41.1
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 39.5
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 19%
Apple iPod 120GB
3GB free, PID null, iPod
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 16.4
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 16.2
19% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FADG Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 12% 51 325 267 60 23.8" 1920 1080 SPT099D E248W-1920
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback