Asus P7P55D-E EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 17:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7 860-$199
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 143
67% 106 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 317
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 346
23% 346 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 49.5
31% 41.1 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 38.6
37% 45.1 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 145 152 153 155 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 302
Write 155
Mixed 197
SusWrite 145
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 32.2
96% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 96.4
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 88.5
68% 93.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 42 42 42 41 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 33
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 38.9
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
363% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 159%
Great: 175%
Samsung SP1604N 160GB-$30
103GB free
Firmware: TM100-24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 55.8
Write 57.9
Mixed 36
SusWrite 22.3
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3120023A 120GB-$42
29GB free
Firmware: 3.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 31.9
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 22.3
21% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 15
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7P55D-E EVO Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $618
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback