Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 854
90% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 151
Parallax 138
113% 142 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1841 1891 1892 1911 1907 1893 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,349
Write 1,929
Mixed 901
SusWrite 1,889
395% 1767 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 73.6
251% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 1,268
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1033
808% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 339%
Great: 353%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
147GB free
Firmware: S4200102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 462 469 478 442 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 446
Mixed 436
SusWrite 452
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 65.3
217% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 270
229% 333 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 132%
Great: 130%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
766GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 107
Write 126
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 118
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
228GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 118 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 98.1
Write 122
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 118
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 194 195 195 193 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 177
Mixed 29
SusWrite 192
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2
350% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 39.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 38.8
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3216 HP Z27n
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback