Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 601
8-Core 888
93% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,148
71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 149
Parallax 139
112% 142 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1793 1911 1957 2013 1951 1933 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,153
Write 1,936
Mixed 942
SusWrite 1,926
390% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 70.8
250% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 1078
DQ Mixed 1,076
830% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 332%
Great: 353%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
116GB free
Firmware: S4200102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 462 469 478 407 406 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 476
Mixed 433
SusWrite 445
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 64.7
214% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 270
229% 332 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
766GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 121 114 123 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 121
Write 33.8
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 119
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
228GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 110 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 82.6
Write 30.8
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 115
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 194 193 195 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 166
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 194
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 27.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 27.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3216 HP Z27n
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback