Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '21 at 09:43
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 868
91% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 151
Parallax 139
113% 143 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 1918 1944 1911 1913 1922 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
343% Outstanding
Read 2,315
Write 1,934
Mixed 938
SusWrite 1,909
397% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 73.4
260% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,265
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 1,088
846% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 343%
Great: 353%
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
144GB free
Firmware: S4200102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 463 468 440 403 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 474
Mixed 434
SusWrite 439
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 65.1
216% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 270
229% 333 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
766GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 117
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
228GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 116 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 87.1
Write 75.4
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 114
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 210 210 206 209 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 179
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 207
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 39.1
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 37.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 HWP3216 HP Z27n
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback