MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Gaming 24%
Desktop 80%
Workstation 23%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1242 x 690 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 664
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 849
53% 849 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 843B) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 29
Parallax 39
22% 31.5 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 25.9
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 107 128 80 66 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 502
Write 434
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 135
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 27.9
96% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 1.1
74% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
394GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 117
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GF2133C13K4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.9
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 32" 1246 671 DSG0B01 DSGR
Typical A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 26%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 22%

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO M2 (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback