Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 00:44
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 713
68% 563 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 106
Parallax 124
104% 119 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 124
Splatting 83.7
98% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 79 6.3 56 27 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 436
Write 365
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 70.7
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 19
35% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 86%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
17GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 414
Mixed 304
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 40.6
137% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 340
264% 361 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
115GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 957 746 937 949 980 1044 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 987
Mixed 1,061
SusWrite 936
239% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 48.5
176% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 728
540% 721 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 194%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
96GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 109 151 149 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 166
Write 145
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 144
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.4% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 27.8
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback