Today's hottest deals

PC STRIX B250H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC STRIX B250H GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK STRIX B250H GAMING
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$83
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 219
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 373
47% 358 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 6.19
5% 7.05 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 12.3
7% 8.34 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 27.4
26% 27 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 28.2
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 76 48 38 47 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 248
Write 116
Mixed 209
SusWrite 53
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 20.8
97% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 21.1
66% 146 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
416GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 185 183 182 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 126
Write 99.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 184
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
355% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 4.1 4.2 3.9 4 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Read 35.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 4.3
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.2
88% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X4GF2133C13K4 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250H GAMING Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: PC STRIX B250H GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback