| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151005 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '22 at 00:27 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.7%
Above average
|
37% 51.2 Pts
|
18% 141 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$110
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.8%
Poor
|
24% 31 fps
|
24% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
778GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 125 126 145 36 15 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
48% 65.6 MB/s
|
147% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
hp v178p 16GB
7GB free, PID 1940
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 13 13 11 12 13 MB/s
|
6.51%
Terrible
|
15% 12.9 MB/s
|
7% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.1%
Poor
|
18% 6.13 GB/s
|
15% 5.2 GB/s
|
51% 79 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 202 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 89x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 40x |
| FX-4300AMD $50Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 25x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $100Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 42x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $110Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 35x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 14x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $212 |