Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 106
52% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 177
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.6
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 84 77 75 66 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 397
Write 397
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 104
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 29.9
99% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 9.3
77% 179 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$93
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 183 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 186
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 183
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback