MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 137
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 667
51% 456 Pts
64-Core 1,591
98% 1,591 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
89% 108 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 105
Splatting 102
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 236 235 220 210 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 464
Write 396
Mixed 373
SusWrite 219
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 37.5
121% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 182
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 248 246 231 218 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 428
Write 338
Mixed 287
SusWrite 232
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 25.5
85% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 186
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 116%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 512GB
454GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 213 212 85 77 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.7% Average
Read 214
Write 106
Mixed 108
SusWrite 145
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 19.4
64% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 61.6
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 94.9
66% 82 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
563GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 183 187 188 185 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 160
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 184
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
367% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
928GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 67.8
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 97.4
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 14 16 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Apple iPod 120GB
55GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 33 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 29.4
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 32
34% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 36.7
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 35
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback