MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 143
60% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 567
46% 404 Pts
64-Core 1,620
100% 1,620 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.3% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
83% 106 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 281 281 262 254 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 488
Write 415
Mixed 387
SusWrite 267
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 40.8
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 293 292 269 264 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 447
Write 401
Mixed 346
SusWrite 278
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 27.5
91% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 195
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 116%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 512GB
458GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 253 193 85 82 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 378
Write 335
Mixed 292
SusWrite 155
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 27.2
93% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 134
98% 126 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59%
Great: 74%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
605GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 198 198 200 198 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 149
Mixed 30
SusWrite 197
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
378% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
930GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 101
Write 95.5
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 101
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 19 20 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Apple iPod 120GB
55GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 32.5
36% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032 320GB
181GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 36.3
Mixed 10.8
21% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 33.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback