MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 72
2-Core 133
57% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 658
50% 449 Pts
64-Core 1,591
98% 1,591 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.51
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.1
82% 102 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 97.6
79% 96.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$78
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 220 246 253 245 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 468
Write 388
Mixed 371
SusWrite 238
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 181
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
466GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 236 254 260 254 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 451
Write 400
Mixed 358
SusWrite 247
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 27.1
88% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 198
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 116%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 512GB
459GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 210 216 85 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 288
Write 111
Mixed 146
SusWrite 147
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 23.8
83% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 73.8
DQ Write 94.4
DQ Mixed 118
80% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
648GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 203 202 204 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 160
Mixed 31
SusWrite 201
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
930GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 96
Mixed 73
SusWrite 101
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 19 20 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Apple iPod 120GB
55GB free, PID 1261
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 32
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 32.4
36% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$120
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.8
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback