Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 15:31
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 799
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 115
Parallax 76.3
66% 90.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 72.7
Splatting 60
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 137 144 120 81 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 460
Write 389
Mixed 325
SusWrite 143
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 17.6
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 36.2
44% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 55%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
103GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 192 39 115 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 515
Write 436
Mixed 408
SusWrite 141
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 10.8
36% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 82.5
104% 179 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 102%
USB3.0 high speed 750GB
697GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 98 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42% Average
Read 94.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 98.3
94% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 21.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback