Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 16 '21 at 15:21
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 790
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 133 139 65 65 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 453
Write 141
Mixed 316
SusWrite 125
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 16.7
77% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 35.6
46% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 55%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
103GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 428 433 437 437 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 511
Write 27.9
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 410
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 8.5
31% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 34.9
40% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59%
Great: 102%
USB3.0 high speed 750GB
697GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 99 101 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 102
Write 66.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96.9
107% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback