Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$170 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 256 84% 154 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 680 75% 590 Pts	64-Core 617 38% 617 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$139 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.1% Good	Lighting 86.8 Reflection 83.9 Parallax 78.1 71% 82.9 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 75.7 Splatting 67.4 66% 83 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$95 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,647 Write 854 Mixed 1,466 293% 1,322 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 73.8 242% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 993 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 980 700% 900 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 108GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,488 Write 1,962 Mixed 1,805 463% 2,085 MB/s	4K Read 57.4 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 76.2 250% 85.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,280 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 1057 796% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 611GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 83 86 86 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 187 Write 149 Mixed 110 SusWrite 85.5 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65% Good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 21.1 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 21.5 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $230Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,923x
Core i9-9900KIntel $387Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,518x
Core i5-9600KIntel $135Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,419x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $460Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	525x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	517x
RTX 2060Nvidia $234Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	460x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	367x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	266x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	232x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	284x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	245x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	188x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $824

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342