Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime17.5 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 19:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 165
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 435
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 21.2
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.3% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 28.1
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 19.1
6% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 7.5
25% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 97%
Netac OnlyDisk 64GB
53GB free, PID 3b00
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.72% Terrible
Read 32.4
Write 18.1
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 11.6
25% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.72%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback