Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200406
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 07 '22 at 12:37
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,094
100% 836 Pts
64-Core 2,211
137% 2,211 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 121
Parallax 13.7
112% 90.6 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 133
Splatting 112
114% 144 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 202 191 240 176 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 503
Write 203
Mixed 235
SusWrite 205
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 31.3
130% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 166
134% 190 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 199 206 205 203 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 142
Write 175
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 202
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Netac OnlyDisk 64GB
28GB free, PID 3b00
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 33 33 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 100
Write 65.9
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 38
70% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 911 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback