Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 257 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 503 67% 501 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8499) 3GB CLim: 1373 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 64.6 Parallax 77.4 47% 66.5 fps	MRender 73.1 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 59 54% 67.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7GE240HMGR-00003 240GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT1303Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 248 248 251 250 250 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 443 Write 252 Mixed 218 SusWrite 239 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 30.3 125% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 176 151% 226 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 89%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 284GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 168 167 169 169 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 167 Mixed 101 SusWrite 167 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.7 341% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 26.7 MC Mixed 23.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 22.9 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	498x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	36x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	60x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	47x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	23x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	19x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	29x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	23x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $941

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16