Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	49.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200904
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '21 at 23:18
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,000 4,653 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 115 2-Core 226 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 783 72% 602 Pts	64-Core 2,222 138% 2,222 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.09 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 164 Reflection 181 Parallax 203 134% 183 fps	Gravity 170 Splatting 120 125% 145 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 373GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1053 975 941 1033 1026 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,734 Write 1,324 Mixed 862 SusWrite 1,023 276% 1,236 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 26.4 119% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 573 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 166 162% 272 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 488%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$270 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 215 201 196 204 199 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 223 Write 222 Mixed 102 SusWrite 207 138% 188 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.3 294% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 177 171 165 173 172 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Read 140 Write 101 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 174 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 132 138 133 139 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 66.3 Write 118 Mixed 66 SusWrite 137 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.6 200% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 90%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 67 63 64 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 117 Write 107 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 68.9 118% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 43%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 67 64 64 73 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 114 Write 100 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 69.1 112% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 735GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 66.7 Write 64.1 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 1.1 53% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 17%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 117 Write 76.6 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 0.4 74% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 8x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 56.8 MC Mixed 36.1 123% 43 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 10.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 160%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	498x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	262x
Core i7-7740XIntel $230Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	96x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $781

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16