Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 112
2-Core 213
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 822
74% 624 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 183
Parallax 205
142% 187 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 175
Splatting 126
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1191 1130 1228 1109 1097 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,384
Mixed 1,451
SusWrite 1,156
331% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 47.4
179% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 182
174% 288 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 217%
Great: 477%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
8.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 222 204 230 201 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 216
Mixed 105
SusWrite 212
138% 188 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.4
311% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 177 173 185 167 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 133
Write 138
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 173
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 152 151 163 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 86
Write 125
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 148
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 35
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 10.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 103%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback