Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 03:22
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 217
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 934
83% 704 Pts
64-Core 2,819
174% 2,819 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 164
Reflection 170
Parallax 205
133% 179 fps
Gravity 160
Splatting 112
117% 136 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 1217 1305 1205 1207 1151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 2,328
Write 1,691
Mixed 1,439
SusWrite 1,214
372% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 47.2
145% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 200
188% 309 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 229%
Great: 477%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
8.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 217 224 209 200 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 227
Mixed 106
SusWrite 210
139% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
307% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 192 176 170 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 176
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 157 149 142 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 58.2
Write 108
Mixed 73
SusWrite 146
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 42.4
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $760
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback