Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 03:35
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 224
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 804
73% 611 Pts
64-Core 2339
145% 2339 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 183
Parallax 173
139% 175 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 145
Splatting 105
96% 119 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1166 1145 1135 1084 1058 1169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 1,317
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 1,126
318% 1,422 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 35.3
127% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 639
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 171
173% 296 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 201%
Great: 477%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$288
8.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 221 208 207 203 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 221
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 215
136% 187 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
302% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 176 172 163 165 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 128
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 174
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 147 146 145 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 78.5
Write 120
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 149
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
165% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 36.4
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 105%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback