Lenovo 81NH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81NH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory14.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 11:15
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 562
54% 445 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 22
11% 16 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 12
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 247 240 239 234 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 620
Write 616
Mixed 411
SusWrite 274
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 30.8
103% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 371
346% 539 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 709 626 626 626 625 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,471
Write 2,138
Mixed 1658
SusWrite 892
400% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 73.5
246% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 870
639% 837 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 266%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Adata 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 22.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81NH Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback