Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 08:29
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 27
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 137
42% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 13
Parallax 3.6
2% 6.4 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1114 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,003
Write 845
Mixed 853
200% 900 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 41.8
137% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 391
289% 386 MB/s
Poor: 109% Great: 199%
AGI960G18AI238 960GB
648GB free
Firmware: H190411
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 309
Mixed 289
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 26.3
91% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 186
137% 180 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Adata 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback