Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 05:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 57
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 186
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 480
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 25.6
15% 27.3 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 14.3
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 697 674 665 656 619 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,677
Write 1,675
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 688
305% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 42.3
146% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 728
530% 699 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 185%
Great: 297%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
551GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 83 82 85 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 66.8
Write 89.6
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 81.6
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 20.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 11.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 58%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback