Asus M4A88T-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A88T-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 44
2-Core 87.6
46% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 147
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.1% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 86.8
Parallax 76.3
75% 85.2 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 72.8
60% 73 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 94 82 83 87 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 216
Write 169
Mixed 172
SusWrite 86
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 32.1
27% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 102%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
569GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 104 104 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 202
Write 185
Mixed 174
SusWrite 102
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 36.2
109% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 45.8
36% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.6
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88T-V EVO Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88T-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback