Asus P7P55D PRO

Performance Results

Gaming 27%
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 21%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 02:04
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 352
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2842) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 45.5
28% 38.6 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 35.7
34% 42 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253TD480G 480GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S8FA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 153 77 75 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 201
Write 229
Mixed 190
SusWrite 116
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 39.8
128% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 53
43% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D PRO Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback