Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 86.3
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 91.2
50% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 177
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 40
Parallax 35.5
26% 35.9 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 24.8
22% 26.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 102 119 111 131 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 403
Write 287
Mixed 250
SusWrite 130
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 5.6
35% 8.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-183.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback