Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 02:53
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 334
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.41
1% 1.65 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$46
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 196 191 178 200 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 302
Write 206
Mixed 207
SusWrite 194
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 45.5
41% 60.6 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
320GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 113 107 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%
General UDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Read 16.8
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.9
6% 5.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback