Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 08:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 197
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 480
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13014.8
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 32.2
19% 24.1 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 15.9
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 889 427 427 424 424 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1340
Write 1,438
Mixed 1,139
SusWrite 503
248% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 51.6
178% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 639
487% 667 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 170%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
25GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 98 88 75 70 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 390
Write 169
Mixed 104
SusWrite 88
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 19.5
103% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 118
122% 206 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 105%
Toshiba MK3261GSY 320GB-$75
51GB free
Firmware: MC001D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 97.1
Write 78.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 69.1
49% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
369GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 72 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 60.2
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 73
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 29.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback