Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 191
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 367
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 1.44
2% 1.72 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.65
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$46
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 196 199 204 196 204 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 375
Write 288
Mixed 161
SusWrite 196
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 27
97% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 36.4
37% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 105%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
320GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 112
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 72%
General UDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 2.9 2.7 3.1 2.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.58% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 1.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.9
6% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.58%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback