HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 56%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 22:16
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 153
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 329
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3397) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 90 80 92 80 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 423
Write 223
Mixed 303
SusWrite 130
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26.5
95% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 181
158% 232 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 178 178 179 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 166
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 178
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
974GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 27.5
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G4E1 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback