Asus P8H67-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 07:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 358
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.44
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.86 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$46
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 201 207 204 206 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 350
Write 332
Mixed 229
SusWrite 203
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 32.3
103% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 44.2
41% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 105%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
321GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 113 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 121
Write 117
Mixed 71
SusWrite 112
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
General UDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 18
Write 2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 2.9
6% 6.15 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LE Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback