Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '20 at 12:51
Run Duration	271 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 88.1 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 845 87% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,067 66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 66.5 61% 71.4 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 71.6 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 871 863 863 795 691 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,693 Write 2,249 Mixed 1,851 SusWrite 866 427% 1,915 MB/s	4K Read 70.5 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 96 319% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,294 DQ Write 937 DQ Mixed 1,120 836% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 346%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 76GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 405 389 404 403 394 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 482 Mixed 393 SusWrite 411 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 54.4 190% 68.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 290 236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 89GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 122 93 88 89 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 498 Write 441 Mixed 352 SusWrite 146 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 41.7 149% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 186 170% 262 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 126GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 279 280 280 280 279 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 389 Mixed 433 SusWrite 300 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 58.3 202% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 234 213% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 452GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 128 132 132 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 174 Write 145 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 130 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 450GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 128 126 129 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 110 Write 106 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 125 71% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 436GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 133 133 133 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 157 Write 117 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 131 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3734 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 44.4 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 29.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 42.4 94% 33 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	219x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $179Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	56x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $779

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)