Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 23:45
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 861
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.1% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 68.1
62% 73.2 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 73.1
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 806 774 744 727 706 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,689
Write 2,279
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 805
426% 1,908 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 94.8
314% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1,122
838% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 304%
Great: 355%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
88GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 393 399 402 402 392 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 481
Mixed 399
SusWrite 409
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.4
188% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 289
235% 333 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 120%
Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
89GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 130 91 82 97 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 500
Write 438
Mixed 353
SusWrite 145
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 41.1
147% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 142
148% 242 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 279 281 281 281 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 472
Mixed 414
SusWrite 300
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.7
200% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 235
214% 327 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
448GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 131 133 133 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 139
Write 110
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 131
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
464GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 128 125 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 118
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 125
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
433GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 131 132 134 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 172
Write 126
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 131
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3734 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 45.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 44.4
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback