Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 86.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 300 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 857 84% 688 Pts	64-Core 1,093 68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 77.2 Reflection 76.2 Parallax 69.4 63% 74.3 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 74.4 60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 886 887 888 867 771 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 2,699 Write 2,496 Mixed 1,878 SusWrite 906 446% 1,995 MB/s	4K Read 71.3 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 98.6 329% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,325 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 1,168 876% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 346%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 35GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 409 408 376 399 229 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 489 Mixed 390 SusWrite 376 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 55.1 194% 70.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 290 236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 89GB free Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 115 92 88 87 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 500 Write 454 Mixed 349 SusWrite 144 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 41.7 150% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 184 168% 256 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 127GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 279 280 280 280 281 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 483 Mixed 409 SusWrite 300 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 57.5 200% 71.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 239 216% 328 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 452GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 132 133 133 132 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 158 Write 132 Mixed 83 SusWrite 130 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 469GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 128 126 129 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 125 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 436GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 132 132 133 133 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 125 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 130 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 43.3 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 29.3 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 42.3 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	219x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $179Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	56x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	40x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	40x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	29x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples	21x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $778

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)