Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 880
81% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 69
63% 73.9 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 74.4
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 825 825 786 753 736 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 2,721
Write 2,441
Mixed 1,807
SusWrite 837
436% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 98.6
314% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 1,025
DQ Mixed 1,174
880% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 311%
Great: 346%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
35GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 342 319 300 308 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 413
Mixed 312
SusWrite 326
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 54.6
179% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 282
231% 330 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
89GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 137 89 83 100 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 490
Write 451
Mixed 371
SusWrite 146
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 41.3
150% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 136
146% 243 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 281 281 281 280 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 313
Mixed 395
SusWrite 301
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.2
205% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 235
215% 327 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 119%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
452GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 132 132 133 133 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 158
Write 123
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 130
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
447GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 127 124 128 126 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 120
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 125
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
438GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 128
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 130
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 41.1
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 42.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback