Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 893
90% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,356
84% 1,356 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 180
Parallax 190
154% 187 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 164
Splatting 115
127% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI500MWR7 500GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19050601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 989 837 930 1112 637 584 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,861
Write 1,296
Mixed 1,010
SusWrite 848
279% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 31.4
206% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 511
477% 741 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 224%
Great: 193%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
474GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1447 1446 1446 1403 1420 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,811
Write 1,433
Mixed 1293
SusWrite 1,434
387% 1,743 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 67.5
237% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 513
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 759
558% 716 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 304%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 86.9
Write 89
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 85.2
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback