Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 16:02
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 977
86% 730 Pts
64-Core 1439
89% 1439 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 182
Parallax 179
154% 183 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 165
Splatting 115
128% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI500MWR7 500GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19050601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1227 1301 1312 1325 1232 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,757
Write 1,301
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 1,089
288% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 31.1
222% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 506
474% 736 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 238%
Great: 193%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1456 1459 1456 1457 1455 1457 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2839
Write 1,450
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 1,457
392% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 66.4
237% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 764
561% 720 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 307%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 84 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 86.5
Write 79.4
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 85.1
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 31.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 32.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback