Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 05:59
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 73.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 287
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 918
87% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,443
89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 182
Parallax 191
154% 187 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 164
Splatting 115
127% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPI500MWR7 500GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19050601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 935 309 267 612 541 570 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,683
Write 1,292
Mixed 984
SusWrite 539
250% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 30.6
210% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 499
470% 734 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 198%
Great: 193%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: VB431D51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1467 1466 1472 1462 1464 1464 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,808
Write 1,450
Mixed 1,311
SusWrite 1,466
390% 1,759 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 67.7
232% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 881
DQ Mixed 761
559% 719 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 305%
Great: 309%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
364GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 82.9
Write 81.7
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 85.2
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 28.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 28.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback